PROPOSED PROJECT
Floor Plan Checker
Catch the two-bedroom listing paired with a one-bedroom plan before it goes live. Read lists of property units, floor plans, and property listings, then mark conflicting areas, room counts, and included features directly on a comparison sheet for the developer's sales team.
The plan says one bedroom. The listing says two.
A-204 revision C + UNIT-08
Compared with draft WEB-17
Authored schematic / not to scale.
Area comes from the supplied unit record, not a measurement of this image.
Apartment B-204
Catch the copied detail
before it becomes a sales claim.
Fictional apartment B-204 has a designated unit record and plan A-204 revision C showing one bedroom, 62 m² of internal area, and a separate 6 m² balcony, with parking not included. Draft listing WEB-17 instead says two bedrooms, 72 m² internal area, and included parking. The example flags three conflicts and one matching balcony field. The authored plan is a schematic for this study, not a measured architectural drawing.
WHAT IS USUALLY DONE
A sales listing is copied from a similar unit and checked against several PDFs by eye. A bedroom count, area figure, or parking inclusion can survive from the old listing even when the attached plan belongs to a different unit. Mixed definitions of internal and total area make the comparison harder.
WHAT SOVRUN CAN DO FOR YOU
Sovrun would build a review sheet that connects each listing to its exact unit record and drawing revision. Document models read the relevant labels and attributes, while matching rules compare like-for-like fields. The sheet highlights conflicts on the plan and in the copy, cites the source for each finding, and prepares a correction draft for the sales team. Unclear unit identity, unreadable dimensions, or conflicting source revisions remain unresolved rather than being guessed.
Compare the same field.
Keep the source beside it.
The internal area stays separate from the balcony area. Room count comes from the matched unit and drawing. Parking comes from the inclusion record. The review does not quietly combine different definitions to make the numbers agree.
62 m² inside.
6 m² on the balcony.
The draft explicitly says “72 m² internal area,” so it conflicts with the 62 m² internal-area field. Adding the balcony does not repair that statement. If the source definition were missing, the review would ask for it rather than choose one.
A correction sales can verify.
With the exact source attached.
The first build supports an agreed unit schedule, drawing set, and listing format. It produces reviewable corrections and a traceable decision record; publishing remains with the sales team.
Three fields to correct.
- Bedrooms
- 2 → 1
- Internal area
- 72 → 62 m²
- Parking
- Included → not included
- Balcony
- 6 m² / matches
One bedroom. The right details.
62 m² internal area.
Separate 6 m² balcony.
Parking not included.
How we’d make it happen.
Match the exact unit and revision
Connect the listing, unit schedule row, and drawing using their identifiers. Confirm which records the developer designates as current and stop the comparison when the match is uncertain.
Compare the same attributes
Read room labels, named area fields, and inclusion notes. Compare internal area with internal area, retain balcony area separately, and mark each mismatch at its source.
Review the corrections before publishing
Show the sales team the evidence and proposed wording. Resolve uncertain sources with the architect, record the decision, and export only the reviewed listing draft.
Where AI helps
Vision and language models help locate unit references, room labels, area notes, and listing statements across drawings and documents. We evaluate them on repeated layouts, low-quality scans, revised plans, and inconsistent area terminology. Code compares normalized units and named area definitions. The tool does not estimate saleable area from an unscaled image, decide which contradictory drawing is legally authoritative, or turn a model’s interpretation into an approved listing.
What people approve
The developer designates the current unit schedule and drawing revision. Sales and the architect review flagged fields, resolve conflicting sources, and approve any corrected copy before publication. Dimension and area definitions stay explicit. This checks listing consistency; it is not a building-code review, structural assessment, survey, or certification of the drawing.
What we’d need to start
- The developer’s designated unit schedule with unit IDs, room counts, named area fields, and included features
- Current floor-plan PDFs with drawing numbers, revision dates, and readable unit references
- Listing drafts or exports, the required comparison fields, and sales and architectural reviewers
How we’d test it
Use examples with mismatched unit IDs, one-bedroom plans attached to two-bedroom copy, internal versus total area confusion, revised drawings, and missing inclusion notes. Check both false alarms and missed conflicts. Every flag should link to the exact source field, and an unreadable or missing value should remain unknown. Verify that correction drafts are never published automatically.
Prepared for Real estate & construction. We would agree on the work after reviewing your brief, materials, and requirements.
This is a proposed project, not completed client work. The visuals and numbers show example outputs, not measured results.
