← BACK TO CASE STUDY GENERATOR
CAMPAIGNS & CONTENTIllustrative retail example

PROPOSED PROJECT

Social Ad Production

Give prospective clients clear reasons to consider your expertise, with social ads that test distinct messages, opening lines or scenes, and edits.

SOCIAL ADS / CREATIVE TEST PLAN

Three reasons to stop. One recognizable product.

Fictional retail example
Reusable production approach

FIELDNOTES / CONCEPTWork, packed.
Generated olive backpack used as a fictional ad concept
Explore the everyday bag ↗
FIELDNOTES / CONCEPTKeys up front.
Generated olive backpack used as a fictional ad concept
Explore the everyday bag ↗
FIELDNOTES / CONCEPTQuiet by design.
Generated olive backpack used as a fictional ad concept
Explore the everyday bag ↗
Static ad layouts for a fictional bag brand. Product photography is AI-generated; feature notes are authored example records. No video was rendered or campaign run. Your project would use its own approved product, offer, and claims.

What this could look like
for your business.

A research consultancy wants ads testing a sample finding, its interview method, and a clear project offer.

WHAT IS USUALLY DONE

Teams often ask an editor to make small variations one at a time. Hooks, source clips, captions, and feedback spread across messages, making it hard to know which version changed which idea.

WHAT SOVRUN CAN DO FOR YOU

Sovrun would build a test plan for one approved offer around choosing a trusted partner: three messages, two opening lines or scenes, and two lengths for prospective clients. Writers select the scripts, editors assemble the approved assets, and the delivery includes a naming system that connects each export to its idea being tested.

Make each version
answer a useful question.

The scope is three messages, two openings for each message, and two lengths: twelve planned edits. Test in stages so a change in message is not confused with a change in opening, duration, audience, or offer.

01 / MESSAGE

Which reason matters?

Compare the three messages at 15 seconds, each using its first opening. Keep the audience, placement, offer, and measurement window consistent.

M1-H1-15 · M2-H1-15 · M3-H1-15
02 / OPENING

Which beginning earns attention?

Within a selected message, compare opening 1 with opening 2 at the same length. Choose the message only after reviewing the first test.

Selected message / H1 vs H2
03 / LENGTH

What does the extra time add?

Compare 6 and 15 seconds with the same selected message and opening. Keep the agreed success measure and attribution window fixed.

Selected message + opening / 6s vs 15s
MEASUREMENT / BEFORE LAUNCH

Agree the primary response, budget allocation, minimum useful sample, and stopping rules. Platform delivery can bias comparisons; use the platform’s controlled experiment where available. An inconclusive test remains inconclusive.

A short edit still
needs a complete idea.

These are timing plans for the workday message. The shorter version preserves the product detail and call to action; the longer version gives the demonstration more room. Both stay tied to the same approved feature record.

6-SECOND PLAN / M1
00–02sOpening
02–04sProduct detail
04–06sCall to action
15-SECOND PLAN / M1
00–03sOpening
03–10sProduct detail
10–15sCall to action

An organized set of edits.
A clear next production decision.

Expected outputs are the creative plan, twelve approved edits, captions, and a register connecting each version to its sources. Performance results come only after an actual campaign is measured.

FIELDNOTES / CONCEPTKeys up front.
Generated olive backpack used as a fictional ad concept
Explore the everyday bag ↗
01 / Three approved creative directionsEach message has a distinct reason to consider the product, supported by the approved brief.
12 EDITS / DELIVERY PLAN
M1 / WORKDAY ORGANIZATION
M1-H1-06M1-H1-15M1-H2-06M1-H2-15
M2 / EASY ACCESS
M2-H1-06M2-H1-15M2-H2-06M2-H2-15
M3 / UNDERSTATED DESIGN
M3-H1-06M3-H1-15M3-H2-06M3-H2-15

Planned outputs / not rendered files

02 / Twelve consistently named editsThree messages × two openings × two lengths. Every export can be traced back to its test and source record.
DELIVERY / REVIEW RECORD

Know what changed.

Example ID
M2-H1-06
Source
R18 / front pocket
Captions
Timing + wording check
Test outcome
Not measured
03 / A release and measurement handoffCaption files, source permissions, claim review, and test settings stay with the approved exports.

How we’d make it happen.

  1. Choose the questions worth testing

    Agree three distinct messages, two openings for each, and 6- and 15-second versions. Define the response sought, source evidence, and staged tests before producing the twelve edits.

  2. Build a controlled edit system

    Use reviewed scripts and permitted source material. Keep the product, claims, captions, and sound consistent across the variants, with a record of the specific message, opening, and duration in each file.

  3. Deliver, test, and decide the next edit

    Review twelve scoped exports, captions, permissions, and the version register. The campaign team runs the agreed tests and uses comparable results to choose the next production step.

Where AI helps

Language models propose openings constrained by the approved offer and claim sheet. Models search video frames and transcripts for relevant moments in permitted footage, then draft captions with suggested timing. We compare current tools on the actual material, preserve source and version references, and reject invented features or unsupported claims. Editors control the final selection, composition, timing, and sound.

What people approve

Writers approve every message, claim, and call to action. Editors check product fidelity, pacing, source permissions, music, captions, and placement requirements. The campaign team approves budgets, controlled test settings, and the measurement plan. Planned exports and illustrative layouts are never reported as a launched campaign or measured improvement.

What we’d need to start

  • Approved offer and claim sheet for your expertise
  • Rights-cleared source footage
  • Channel specifications and the response sought from prospective clients

How we’d test it

Check twelve unique message/opening/length combinations, exact edit duration, approved claim coverage, caption accuracy, source permissions, and placement fit. In later campaign tests, compare one factor at a time with an agreed primary response, allocation, sample requirement, attribution window, and stopping rule. Keep inconclusive results visible; do not claim causal uplift from unmatched platform totals.

Prepared for Professional services. We would agree on the work after reviewing your brief, materials, and requirements.

DISCUSS THIS PROJECT

This is a proposed project, not completed client work. The visuals and numbers show example outputs, not measured results.