← BACK TO CASE STUDY GENERATOR
CREATIVE TECHNOLOGYBeauty & personal care exclusive

PROPOSED PROJECT

Beauty Product Claims Checker

Check beauty product wording against the claims your team has approved, and show the supporting documents for each statement.

Claims reviewNeeds a decision
Hydrating cream / launch headlineILLUSTRATIVE RECORD
Approved source
CLAIM 001
“Helps skin feel hydrated.”
Product claim register
Example source · revision 03

The supplied wording is the reference. A stronger promise needs its own support.

Draft campaign copy
Repairs the skin barrier overnight.
01

New efficacy claim“Repairs” goes beyond the approved hydration wording.

02

Unsupported timeframeThe source does not establish an overnight result.

Proposed revision

Helps skin feel hydrated.

Awaiting human sign-off
A sample review screen: source wording, two specific flags, and a proposed correction. Static concept mockup.

The difference is
in the evidence.

The brief: review launch copy against the beauty team’s approved claim register. Every flagged phrase should show what changed and where the supporting language came from.

WHAT IS USUALLY DONE

A comment without
the source attached.

Review comment

“Can we say this? Please check the claim sheet.”

The writer searches the documents, finds the right version, and reconstructs why the line was challenged.

WHAT SOVRUN CAN DO FOR YOU

A reviewable correction
with its evidence.

Repairs the skin barrier overnight.Helps skin feel hydrated.

The copy, the supporting passage, and the unresolved decision stay together for the claims owner.

What lands
with your team.

The expected result is a usable review package. These sample artifacts show what your writers, product team, and approvers would receive.

COPY REVIEW

Flagged copy

Repairs the skin barrier overnight.
Timeframe unsupported

Owner: claims reviewer
Status: decision pending

01 / Flag reportSpecific phrases, issues, and the correct asset version.
SOURCE INDEX

Evidence trail

Claim
001
Product
Hydrating cream
Source
Register · rev 03

“Helps skin feel hydrated.”

02 / Evidence mapA direct route from each finding to the supplied source.
REVIEW RECORD

Decision history

  1. Draft checkedTwo issues flagged
  2. Revision proposedSource wording retained
  3. Owner reviewApproval pending
03 / Review logThe proposed change, reviewer decision, and final version.
Flag → evidence → decision

A clear review record for the person approving product claims. We would test accuracy and reviewer effort before judging how well it works.

How we’d make it happen.

  1. Organize

    Tie each approved claim to its product, market, wording, and source document.

  2. Compare

    Highlight where draft copy changes the meaning or extends beyond the approved scope.

  3. Resolve

    Route each flag to the named claims owner and retain the decision with the copy version.

Where AI helps

AI extracts and compares claim language. It can identify a likely mismatch, but it cannot establish efficacy or make a regulatory approval decision.

What people approve

The product and claims reviewers decide whether wording is supported and appropriate for each market. An unmatched claim stays unresolved.

What we’d need to start

  • Approved claim register by product and market
  • Authorized supporting documents
  • Draft product pages and campaign copy

How we’d test it

Use known accepted and rejected claims to measure missed overstatements and false flags; a reviewer remains responsible for release.

Prepared for Beauty & personal care. We would agree on the work after reviewing your brief, materials, and requirements.

DISCUSS THIS PROJECT

This is a proposed project, not completed client work. The visuals and numbers show example outputs, not measured results.